"To
tame the savageness of man and make gentle the life of this world"
In
her book A
Lie Too Big to Fail, longtime Kennedy researcher
(of both JFK and RFK) Lisa Pease lays out, in meticulous detail, how
witnesses with evidence of conspiracy were silenced by the Los
Angeles Police Department; how evidence was deliberately altered and,
in some instances, destroyed; and how the justice system and the
media failed to present the truth of the case to the public. Pease
reveals how the trial was essentially a sham, and how the prosecution
did not dare to follow where the evidence led.
A
Lie Too Big to Fail asserts the idea that a government can never
investigate itself in a crime of this magnitude. Was the convicted
Sirhan Sirhan a willing participant? Or was he a mind-controlled
assassin? It has fallen to independent researchers like Pease to lay
out the evidence in a clear and concise manner, allowing readers to
form their theories about this event.
Pease
places the history of this event in the context of the era and
provides shocking overlaps between other high-profile murders and
attempted murders of the time. Lisa Pease goes further than anyone
else in proving who likely planned the assassination, who the
assassination team members were, and why Kennedy was deemed such a
threat that he had to be taken out before he became President of the
United States.
The
book will be out on Robert Kennedy's birthday, November 20th, this
year.
Lee
Camp mentions that it looked like Robert Kennedy was about to become
president and he was talking a lot about the inequality in the
country and raising people up and civil rights and all the things
that seem to have gotten Martin Luther King killed.
Camp
interviewed Lisa Pease and she gave some interesting information. She
explained that Robert Kennedy was seen as even bigger threat than his
brother JFK by the US deep state, so, they had to get rid of him
before his potential rise in power:
I’ve
come to believe that the Kennedy family and their former politics was
sadly an "anomaly" in our history in the sense that there's
almost been these two competing worldviews.
One
is, America has the right to dominate other nations, to affect regime
change when we feel like it and to take the resources of others when
we feel it benefits us. That's one world view. The other world view
is, America has the right to cooperate with other nations, to pay for
the resources of other nations and not just take them through war.
The Kennedys represented that latter view which was not really in
vogue at the time when JFK came to power.
Robert
Kennedy would have been in a position to expose perhaps the CIA's
role in his brother's assassination. When Robert Kennedy first
learned that John Kennedy had been killed, one of his first calls was
to the CIA. He said 'did you guys kill my brother?' I mean that's
literally one of his first calls because he knew that that was
Kennedy's biggest enemy in the government and if it was an inside job
it had probably come from there.
Of
course, he did also suspect the mafia might have done it because he
had himself personally gone after so many mobsters when he was
working in the Senate on the racketeering committee and prosecuting
them. And of course, the CIA and the mob were working very closely
together at that point in time. So, one is almost the same as the
other at a certain level.
Once
Bobby started running for president he became a significant threat
because not only he was going to pursue the policies of JFK, he was
going to be even more radical about them.
He
had actually gone to Latin America and talked to miners working the
coal mines. And afterwards, he was like 'oh my gosh, if I had to have
their life I'd be a communist too'. I mean he could really see the
oppression that American business policies had created in some of
those places and he really understood. He wanted to take it even
further. So, he was just as big a threat as John Kennedy was and it
would have looked even more suspicious if somebody had waited till he
became president.
A
lot of people don't know it - Robert Kennedy was not the only one
shot there. Five other people were wounded. Five bullets were removed
from other people. Two bullets were removed from Kennedy and then,
there were three holes in the ceiling, which is an odd number. So,
they decided one bullet had to have been lost in the ceiling space,
another must have entered and ricocheted and come back down to make
three holes.
Full
interview:
Comments
Post a Comment